You know those puzzles we had when we were kids? They were cut from wood and had no more than half a dozen pieces, which matched with our little hands and puzzle-making abilities when were three. Well, it seems, I drew one.
Not really. In reality I was standing at the end of St. Denis street in Quebec City, looking up the hill at the depicted scene. What was different was that I decided to paint it as a bunch of interlocking shapes. As a basis for this I drew, in pencil, a very light box around the building and then drew boxes where the windows rested.
Then I grabbed a paint brush, a scary instrument in my hands. You see, I’m trying to figure out a few things with watercolors. I’m trying to figure out how to mix paints thicker than the pastel-like colors we beginners often use. Mostly this has resulted in over-kill in my sketches but I’m making progress. The other thing I’m investigating is whether I can sketch directly with a brush. This is definitely putting the cart before the horse but it’s become a nothing ventured, nothing gained sort of thing for me.
Anyhow, I became overwhelmed with painting thoughts as I tried to ‘draw’ this with a brush. I drew each shape, trying to “build the wash” (Holmes-style), avoid any outline effect, and also trying to keep the shape correct. I was so consumed with those tasks that the thought of actually trying to draw the scene got lost in the shuffle. After I’d created my kid’s puzzle, I used a pen to draw window frames and such but nothing was going to help this sketch much. Interesting exercise. It’s said that we learn from our mistakes. I must have learned a lot with this one.
You’re selling it short Larry. I love it. You’ve kept it simple which I struggle with. Now I’m going to think “kid’s puzzle” next t8me I go out to sketch. Thanks!
“You’ve kept it simple…” may be giving me too much credit Paula. Simple it came out, but only because I was so involved with trying to keep edges from forming within each of the shapes that I didn’t pay attention to anything else. What I’ve realized is that the puzzle nature of this sketch comes from treating the 5-6 shapes as flat, 2-D shapes rather than acknowledging that each has a 3D form as I typically try to do.
I like it! Thank you for sharing.
Very successful piece. I keep telling myself to just look at the shapes and not worry about drawing/painting the thing. Still practicing!
Yes, viewing scenes as a series of interlocking shapes is much better than only seeing lines. Taken too far, ignoring that you’re actually trying to depict 3D forms, generates the puzzle-like nature of the sketch I did.